Open ArcanaARCANA APERTA
DISC-0012 / ITEM-0005
Ordo Templi Orientis · Germany / worldwide
View in explorer ↗This record as JSON
Initiation rituals of the degree system and the instructions reserved for the highest degrees.
Modified
Provisional: no dated status evidence is linked.
Disclosure dates, source publication dates, tradition origins and dates of practice are separate.
Not recorded.
Inspected the hosted transcription’s De Homunculo Epistola, De Nuptiis Secretis section II and Appendix A on 2026-11-04. This web copy has not been collated with the 1973 printed edition or original manuscripts. Appendix A reports private manuscripts and typescripts, with conjectural restorations in the sixth degree.
Publicism hosts a transcription attributed to the 1973 Samuel Weiser edition. Its upload date is unknown. The HTML capture is identified separately as ARTF-0007. Printed pagination and exact manuscript fidelity remain unassessed.
Open artifact / recovery route ↗
Complete HTML response captured, selected sections read. Not a hash of the printed book or original manuscripts.
Open artifact / recovery route ↗
The page identifies itself as Anna’s Archive. Its operator identity and file identity were not independently established. The filename contains a reported MD5-like identifier; it was not verified from payload bytes. The linked viewer returned a general home/search page, not readable book pages. No download, payload hash, exact byte count or IPFS CID is claimed. The fiction category was not accepted as a factual classification of this work.
These claims may cite other sources for the same restricted item. Supporting and contradicting evidence remain separate.
Liber Agape directs that a candidate be bound by oath and privately initiated into the final mystery.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
Checked the hosted wording. The web transcription’s manuscript fidelity remains unassessed; this is a content claim about that copy.
Agape describes partaking of a sacramental elixir joining masculine and feminine principles, promising divine life through it.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
Records the text’s sacramental claims, not demonstrated biological or supernatural effects. Interpretation of sexual symbolism is also addressed in SRC-0095.
The O.T.O. secret rite descended through medieval Templars, Rosicrucians and Hermetic Brothers of Light.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
The transcription asserts this lineage; no independent historical chain is established by the inspected evidence. Retained as an unestablished lineage claim, not as documented institutional descent.
De Arte Magica says it is preferable for the sexual partner to be unaware of the rite’s sacred character.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
Checked the hosted text. This concerns withholding the religious purpose; the separate physical-consent requirement in section XII is retained in CLM-0146.
The same text requires the partner’s enthusiastic agreement to physical participation.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
Checked the hosted text. Physical agreement is distinct from knowing the rite’s sacred character; the latter issue is recorded separately in CLM-0145.
The text assigns magical efficacy to the initiated man’s will and says a female initiate’s intention cannot replace it.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
An attributed gender hierarchy in the inspected text, not a claim about every modern O.T.O. body or about actual supernatural efficacy.
Crowley calls the proposed cosmic mechanisms unproven while asserting personal confidence in the operation’s efficacy.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
Keeps the author’s own distinction between confidence and unproven explanatory hypotheses. No scientific validation is supplied by the text.
The preamble justifies transmitting restricted instruction to selected initiates by fear that world war could destroy its human custodians.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
The reason is stated in this particular document. It is not independently established as the sole motive for O.T.O. secrecy.
Hedenborg White associates the historical VIII°, IX° and Crowley’s added XI° with masturbation, heterosexual intercourse and anal intercourse, respectively.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
Checked the scholarly discussion and its qualifiers. This classifies historical teachings; it does not establish the present practices of every branch.
Her account describes sacramental consumption, or talismanic application, of sexual fluids in Crowley’s recorded operations.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
The study draws on Crowley’s records. No independent corroboration of each recorded performance or claimed result is asserted.
The article interprets the Cakes of Light’s coded blood references as menstrual or sexual fluids, including semen, rather than literal child blood.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
The author labels these readings common interpretations. Retaining the sexual meaning does not establish an allegation of child sacrifice.
The article reports an E.G.C. manual specifying burned-cake ash when a biological ingredient is used; it does not say every cake contains it.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
The underlying manual was not inspected directly in this batch. The optional ingredient and ash form must not be converted into a claim that all congregants consume fresh bodily fluids.
The exposed De Nuptiis Secretis text attributes human sacrifice and sacramental use of victims’ blood to a Jewish group it calls Chassidim.
Contradicting sources: none recorded.
Checked what the transcription alleges. This is not evidence of a Jewish rite; the underlying allegation is assessed separately in the next claim.
Jewish ritual requires non-Jewish victims’ blood for sacramental purposes.
The exposed text repeats a blood-libel allegation. The museum article identifies this allegation as false and explains the religious prohibition on blood consumption. Neither the leak nor its age establishes the practice. Retained under the accusing text’s item, not as an authenticated Jewish tradition.
SRC-0009 · source_authenticity_unassessed: Source authenticity is unassessed; this is separate from the truth of its assertions.SRC-0009 · source_without_content_hash: No source-level content_hash is recorded; linked artifact hashes may identify excerpts, derivatives or metadata instead.DISC-0012 · record_unreviewed: Record review status is unreviewed; review is not proof of truth.DISC-0012 · disclosure_without_coverage: The parts, version or edition covered by this disclosure have not been specified.ARTF-0007 · artifact_partial: Artifact inspection is partial; use only its recorded inspected portions.ARTF-0008 · artifact_metadata_only: Artifact inspection is metadata_only; use only its recorded inspected portions.ITEM-0005 · status_without_dated_evidence: The recorded practice status is provisional: no dated status claims are linked.Reviewed means checked against a source. It does not establish source authenticity, independent corroboration or present-day practice.