Open ArcanaARCANA APERTA

DISC-0112 / ITEM-0066

Atefá room ceremony and lineage-specific initiation prescriptions

Cuban Osha-Ifá in the Proyecto Orunmila Atefá compilation · Regla and Guanabacoa collection context, Havana, Cuba; diaspora web circulation

Disclosure date
Undated
Date precision
Unknown
Disclosure method
Exposure publication
Extent
Partial
Record review
Reviewed

View in explorer ↗This record as JSON

Restricted material and access

A practitioner-attributed initiation manual inspected through a file-sharing site’s extracted text, including an oath and conditional ritual directions.

Material type
Initiatory rite
Restricted to
The text addresses officiants and sponsors and prescribes a blindfolded novice phase; complete membership and attendance rules are not established here
Restriction mechanism
controlled_access, vow
Stated reason
A general reason for restricting transmission is not established by the inspected passages
Tradition origins
Not recorded

Recorded practice status

Unknown

Status as of
Not recorded
Status claims
Not recorded

Disclosure dates, source publication dates, tradition origins and dates of practice are separate.

What this disclosure covers

Mirror text: imprint, introduction and selected pp. 23, 57–60, 98–99. The underlying PDF and complete manual were not inspected.

A publication year is not an established earliest disclosure date. For the mirrored manual, the dates of first online exposure and first inclusion of the selected prescriptions remain unestablished; exposure_publication describes the inspected posting, not proof of an unauthorized leak.

The source

Ceremonias de Atefá ↗ (SRC-0121; authenticity: Uncertain)

Author
Ernesto Valdés Jane (compiler)
Original publication
2001
Linked edition
Not recorded
Format
Book
Provenance
member_publication → anonymous_posting
Rights of source work
Copyrighted
Identifiers
isbn:9781105021794
Source content hash
Not recorded

Read the mirror’s actual extracted text: imprint and collection introduction, and selected printed pp. 23, 57–60 and 98–99. The imprint claims editions in 2001, 2004 and 2007, carries a present-edition copyright of 2011 and repeating 2012 footers. No single edition_year is assigned. The site credits uploader Juan Perez, whose identity and authority are unverified. Direct capture failed DNS resolution; the web reader exposed the text, while the Download File link returned to the same page. No PDF bytes or hash are claimed.

The attribution is to a practitioner compilation, not to the file-sharing uploader. The introduction describes collected priestly manuscripts and comparison across houses; that is the compiler’s account, not an audited chain of custody. The mirror has not been compared against the publisher edition or the manuscripts and is not labelled an authenticated leak. Instruction, actual performance and claimed efficacy are separate questions.

File or recording · Document

Open artifact / recovery route ↗

Artifact ID
ARTF-0042
Inspection
Partial
Inspected parts
Mirror’s extracted imprint and introduction; selected printed pp. 23, 57–60, 98–99; no PDF page images
SHA-256
Not recorded
IPFS CID
Not recorded
BitTorrent info-hash
Not recorded

Read through the web reader. Direct HTTPS capture failed DNS resolution; Download File returned to the same page. No exact-byte hash, size, retrieved PDF or verified upload date is asserted. This is an extracted-text artifact, not an authenticated manuscript or insider leak.

Claims about this item

These claims may cite other sources for the same restricted item. Supporting and contradicting evidence remain separate.

CLM-0275 · Content

The Atefá room sequence prescribes an oath involving a candle, followed by removal of the blindfold.

Claim support
Single source
Record review
Reviewed
Period
Prescriptions in the mirrored text with 2011/2012 imprint details; performance dates unestablished
Locators
SRC-0121: p. 57, Ceremonia del cuarto
Sources counted as independent
Not recorded

Supporting sources

Contradicting sources: none recorded.

Checked the extracted text, not the underlying PDF, original manuscript or a performed ceremony. Copy fidelity and current practice remain unestablished.

  • SRC-0121: Source authenticity is uncertain; this is separate from the truth of its assertions.
  • SRC-0121: No source-level content_hash is recorded; linked artifact hashes may identify excerpts, derivatives or metadata instead.
  • ARTF-0042: Artifact inspection is partial; use only its recorded inspected portions.

CLM-0276 · Content

For one Atemoleta choice, the text instructs the sponsor to replace the chosen object with the one it calls good.

Claim support
Single source
Record review
Reviewed
Period
Prescriptions in the mirrored text with 2011/2012 imprint details; performance dates unestablished
Locators
SRC-0121: p. 58, Atemoleta
Sources counted as independent
Not recorded

Supporting sources

Contradicting sources: none recorded.

A conditional textual instruction, not observed behaviour or an established finding of fraud. The mirror’s terminology has not been collated with the print edition.

  • SRC-0121: Source authenticity is uncertain; this is separate from the truth of its assertions.
  • SRC-0121: No source-level content_hash is recorded; linked artifact hashes may identify excerpts, derivatives or metadata instead.
  • ARTF-0042: Artifact inspection is partial; use only its recorded inspected portions.

CLM-0277 · Content

The text excludes an Awó with Ogbesa from the head-kicking ceremony because he would symbolically kick his own head.

Claim support
Single source
Record review
Reviewed
Period
Prescriptions in the mirrored text with 2011/2012 imprint details; performance dates unestablished
Locators
SRC-0121: p. 59, Baile de Atemoleta
Sources counted as independent
Not recorded

Supporting sources

Contradicting sources: none recorded.

The stated reason is part of the prescription. It does not establish a physical assault on a person; the passage concerns the ritual object.

  • SRC-0121: Source authenticity is uncertain; this is separate from the truth of its assertions.
  • SRC-0121: No source-level content_hash is recorded; linked artifact hashes may identify excerpts, derivatives or metadata instead.
  • ARTF-0042: Artifact inspection is partial; use only its recorded inspected portions.

CLM-0278 · Content

The washing section distinguishes the ordering of songs in the Miguel Febles and Tata Gaitán branches.

Claim support
Single source
Record review
Reviewed
Period
Prescriptions in the mirrored text with 2011/2012 imprint details; performance dates unestablished
Locators
SRC-0121: p. 60, Lavatorio
Sources counted as independent
Not recorded

Supporting sources

Contradicting sources: none recorded.

A textual statement of lineage variation; neither sequence is assumed to apply to every Ifá community.

  • SRC-0121: Source authenticity is uncertain; this is separate from the truth of its assertions.
  • SRC-0121: No source-level content_hash is recorded; linked artifact hashes may identify excerpts, derivatives or metadata instead.
  • ARTF-0042: Artifact inspection is partial; use only its recorded inspected portions.

CLM-0279 · Content

An early preparation directs the novice to have no contact with women from that point.

Claim support
Single source
Record review
Reviewed
Period
Prescriptions in the mirrored text with 2011/2012 imprint details; performance dates unestablished
Locators
SRC-0121: p. 23, Como se hacen uno o dos Ifá
Sources counted as independent
Not recorded

Supporting sources

Contradicting sources: none recorded.

The inspected instruction does not establish its exact duration or justify translating contact as an invariably sexual prohibition.

  • SRC-0121: Source authenticity is uncertain; this is separate from the truth of its assertions.
  • SRC-0121: No source-level content_hash is recorded; linked artifact hashes may identify excerpts, derivatives or metadata instead.
  • ARTF-0042: Artifact inspection is partial; use only its recorded inspected portions.

CLM-0280 · Content

The food sequence sends an officiant outside the igbódù doorway to offer portions to women and men who are not babalawos.

Claim support
Single source
Record review
Reviewed
Period
Prescriptions in the mirrored text with 2011/2012 imprint details; performance dates unestablished
Locators
SRC-0121: pp. 98–99, food sequence after the offerings
Sources counted as independent
Not recorded

Supporting sources

Contradicting sources: none recorded.

This describes a boundary in one sequence. It does not establish total exclusion from every phase or from all Osha-Ifá rites.

  • SRC-0121: Source authenticity is uncertain; this is separate from the truth of its assertions.
  • SRC-0121: No source-level content_hash is recorded; linked artifact hashes may identify excerpts, derivatives or metadata instead.
  • ARTF-0042: Artifact inspection is partial; use only its recorded inspected portions.

Evidence qualifications

Reviewed means checked against a source. It does not establish source authenticity, independent corroboration or present-day practice.

Item notes

Scope is the actual initiation prescription, not an inference that every page is confidential. This text has not been collated with the publisher edition, its underlying libretas or a performed ceremony. The presence of an oath does not establish a specific nondisclosure clause; no current-practice or efficacy claim is made.